This paper critically assesses the proposed #euaiact regarding #riskmanagement and acceptability of #highrisk #ai systems. The Act aims to promote trustworthy AI with proportionate #regulations but its criteria, "as far as possible" (AFAP) and "state of the art," are deemed unworkable and lacking in proportionality and trustworthiness. The Parliament's proposed amendments, introducing "reasonableness" and cost-benefit analysis, are argued to be more balanced and workable.
top of page
Rechercher
Posts récents
Voir tout“As analysts are primary recipients of these reports, we investigate whether and how analyst forecast properties have changed following...
This study proposes a new method for detecting insider trading. The method combines principal component analysis (PCA) with random forest...
Cyber risk classifications often fail in out-of-sample forecasting despite their in-sample fit. Dynamic, impact-based classifiers...
bottom of page
Comments