"We argue that simply pooling data across banks treats banks equally but is subject to two deficiencies: it may distort the impact of legitimate portfolio features, and it is vulnerable to implicit misdirection of legitimate information to infer bank identity. We compare various notions of regression fairness to address these deficiencies, considering both forecast accuracy and equal treatment. In the setting of linear models, we argue for estimating and then discarding centered bank fixed effects as preferable to simply ignoring differences across banks."
top of page
Rechercher
Posts récents
Voir tout“As analysts are primary recipients of these reports, we investigate whether and how analyst forecast properties have changed following...
This study proposes a new method for detecting insider trading. The method combines principal component analysis (PCA) with random forest...
Cyber risk classifications often fail in out-of-sample forecasting despite their in-sample fit. Dynamic, impact-based classifiers...
bottom of page
Comments