This study explores how AI affects auditors' judgments on complex estimates. It finds that when clients use AI for estimates, auditors' planned responses don't match their risk assessments. Auditors tend to plan less (more) work if AI-generated estimates were more (less) accurate previously, potentially posing concerns about audit effectiveness due to automation bias.
top of page
Rechercher
Posts récents
Voir tout“As analysts are primary recipients of these reports, we investigate whether and how analyst forecast properties have changed following...
This study proposes a new method for detecting insider trading. The method combines principal component analysis (PCA) with random forest...
Cyber risk classifications often fail in out-of-sample forecasting despite their in-sample fit. Dynamic, impact-based classifiers...
bottom of page
Comentarios