"We respond to Tetlock et al. (2022) showing 1) how expert judgment fails to reflect tail risk, 2) the lack of compatibility between forecasting tournaments and tail risk assessment methods (such as extreme value theory). More importantly, we communicate a new result showing a greater gap between the properties of tail expectation and those of the corresponding probability."
top of page
Rechercher
Posts récents
Voir tout“As analysts are primary recipients of these reports, we investigate whether and how analyst forecast properties have changed following...
This study proposes a new method for detecting insider trading. The method combines principal component analysis (PCA) with random forest...
Cyber risk classifications often fail in out-of-sample forecasting despite their in-sample fit. Dynamic, impact-based classifiers...
bottom of page
Comments