By analyzing the content of #rating#reports, the study identifies seven different mechanisms that rating analysts are concerned about, with the most significant being the #misstatement-related violations of #debt covenants that increase #liquidityrisk and #compliancerisk. The study finds that #creditratings and #reputationalrisk of #misreporting firms are adversely affected for up to seven years after an intentional misstatement becomes publicly known. The impact of an intentional misstatement on a firm's credit rating is most pronounced when rating analysts express concerns about covenant violations.
top of page
Rechercher
Posts récents
Voir tout“As analysts are primary recipients of these reports, we investigate whether and how analyst forecast properties have changed following...
00
This study proposes a new method for detecting insider trading. The method combines principal component analysis (PCA) with random forest...
00
Cyber risk classifications often fail in out-of-sample forecasting despite their in-sample fit. Dynamic, impact-based classifiers...
30
bottom of page
Comments