2 résultats pour « strict liability »
This paper addresses the inadequacy of the current U.S. tort liability system in handling the catastrophic risks posed by advanced AI systems. The author proposes punitive damages to incentivize caution in AI development, even without malice or recklessness. Additional suggestions include recognizing AI as an abnormally dangerous activity and requiring liability insurance for AI systems. The paper concludes by acknowledging the limits of tort liability and exploring complementary policies for mitigating catastrophic AI risk.
Determining liability for AI-caused harm lacks clear answers. In cases involving Tesla autopilot accidents, unfair discrimination by AI in HR, or medical procedures, responsibility is blurry. The EU's proposed AI liability regime and AI Act aim to address these complexities, bridging gaps in risk regulation and liability for AI-human interactions.